Skip to content
Atomic Bible
Research method

Keep the authority behind every claim visible.

The canon separates requirements, findings, frameworks, guidance, methods, examples, and local choices before any principle can inform report work.

Evidence classes

Classification, not a universal ranking.

A standard can govern behavior without proving unique perceptual superiority. A study can support an effect without governing a business context.

N

Normative

Law, contract, or formal standard in scope

E1

Synthesized empirical

Replication, convergence, or strong synthesis

E2

Primary empirical

A primary study; independent support not assumed

F

Framework

Academic model for design or evaluation

G

Guidance

Institutional interpretation, not a requirement

P

Practitioner

Professional method treated as a hypothesis

X

Exemplar

Craft or influence, not a general rule

H

House convention

Local operational choice without superiority claim

Principle lifecycle
01

Register

Identify the primary or authoritative source, access, limits, and verification state.

02

Extract & triangulate

Record actual claims, population, task, outcome, contrary evidence, and replication.

03

Synthesize

Write the narrowest candidate with scope, confidence, boundary, and evaluation.

04

Audit & revise

Test report work and readers; accept, condition, reject universally, or retire.

Rejected universals

Narrower claims beat clean slogans.

  • Not every report must request an action.
  • No chart type is best across all tasks.
  • Answer-first is conditional, not a cognitive law.
  • Animation, minimal ink, and fixed signal rules are not universal defaults.
Source verification

Identity is not extraction.

Official-record checks the issuer’s record. Citation-checked confirms identity and reported contribution. Full-text-reviewed records relevant pages or rules.

No source is yet full-text-reviewed in the initial register, so initial principles remain candidates.

biai-os dogfood

Field evidence, never inherited truth.

Representative recurring reports from biai-os supply realistic tasks, practices, failures, and readers.

Audits and reader studies will measure lookup and comparison accuracy, signal detection, qualification recall, confidence calibration, decision identification, accessibility, effort, and longitudinal recognition. Existing chart bans, IBCS adaptations, XmR rules, confidence labels, and report anatomy face the same review as outside claims.